Weltanschauung
By Matt Koehl
The
Germans have given us a word with which we may designate a true philosophic
stance: Weltanschauung. Generally translated as worldview, the word means much more than
a mere “view of the word”; and it suggests something other than a familiar,
homespun philosophy, with folksy conclusions about the meaning of life.
A
true weltanschauung is far different
from the random, eclectic stew of likes, dislikes and ad hoc opinions that most people have.
Perhaps
we can better understand what a weltanschauung is, if we first consider what it
is not. It is not an agglomeration of
acquired facts. It is not some
cracker-barrel set of preferences and prejudices. It is not a bunch of schemes, stratagems and
gimmicks. It is not a political
program. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is not a military arsenal. It is not media
access or high-tech capability. It is
not a logo or a uniform. It is not “movement”
gossip. It is not a personal
psychosis.
A weltanschauung, or worldview, is
something a bit more profound. It is a
systematic ideology—a total view of
life. As such, it enables one to examine and evaluate systematically and
consistently all historical and universal phenomena—past, present and
future—according to a specific value system which it incorporates.
Not only does such a worldview enable an evaluation of any fact, situation or
event, but it provides the basis for a faith—a system of belief—religious or
political, as the focus of one’s personal commitment.
Indeed,
those with a worldview are serious, steady and consistent, to the same degree
that those without one are not. Those
with such a weltanschauung have a
real, defined sense of purpose and direction in their lives, just as those
without such a worldview lack meaningful purpose and direction.
* *
*
Although
a worldview is commonly thought of as political, it can just as readily be
religious. Indeed, from an ideological
standpoint the line between the political and the religious is, in the final
analysis, nonexistent. Both represent
systems of e
Whether
political or religious, a weltanschauung
is above all—REVOLUTIONARY! Indeed, no real revolution on Earth is conceivable
without a radically new philosophy and vision.
And
ultimately, all worldviews strive for one thing: power—victory. Every true worldview strives for the triumph
of the particular idea it represents—this, to the exclusion of all competing
worldviews. By its very nature, a weltanschauung is exclusive and
unwilling to concede to any other ideology.
Perhaps
the best examples of a worldview can be seen in Marxism and Christianity. With their respective visions of a
proletarian paradise and a spiritual Zion, each represents a distinctive weltanschauung. So does National
Socialism, with its vision of a higher, more godlike humanity.
But
whereas the two former worldviews presume to “conquer Nature,” with both
sharing similar notions of human equality, our worldview is based on the
aristocratic principle of inequality and respect for the eternal laws of
Nature, which are the laws of life—ultimately
emanating from that immanent Force which rules and dominates this universe—and
which include the laws of racial conservation and higher development.
* *
*
It
was none other than our Leader, Adolf Hitler, who brought these laws to the
consciousness of modern man in the form of his revolutionary, new
doctrine. Without this singular
weltanschauung, which was given to us for our salvation, one cannot properly speak
of National Socialism.
Similarly,
one cannot honestly describe as National Socialist someone who lacks a
worldview, or more properly a National
Socialist worldview. It can, in
fact, be stated categorically that there is no such thing as a true National
Socialist, without a proper National Socialist worldview.
Even
though one may call oneself a “National Socialist” and have all the Third Reich
memorabilia in the world—and even though one may wave a thousand Swastikas and
shout “Heil Hitler!” a million times over—he is no true National Socialist,
unless he happens to possess such a weltanschauung.
Unfortunately,
there are many who assume that they can make up for their ideological
deficiency with military arsenals, high technology, fancy schemes, plans and
programs, huffing, puffing and posturing, shaved heads, tattoos, costumes,
krinklejammers, doodads, freaky fads, bombast, bluster and “movement”
gossip.
The
greater the lack of a true ideological outlook, in fact, the greater the
tendency to look to such non-ideological devices for salvation—if not, indeed,
for cathartic release. None of these
pathetic substitutes, however, can ever compensate for the lack of a worldview
and genuine National Socialist understanding.
It is
hardly surprising to observe some of the silly ways in which such pitiful
behavior manifests itself. During
election year, for example, we have the recurrent spectacle of the
ideologically challenged regularly out there among those calling form some ersatz, non-National Socialist to drop
down out of the sky to save them!
* *
*
There are those, of course,
who for one reason or another, are unable to commit to any cause or give their
loyalty to anyone or anything. Character
deficiency aside, this type can be seen perennially bouncing from group to
group and cause to cause, because of some perceived success or lack of success
of the moment—but particularly because they don’t have a fixed ideology, which
would preclude such erratic opportunism and instability.
There are those, too, who
have attempted to form incongruous amalgams with other doctrines and
movements. Here again, however, such
pathetic attempts merely point to the absence of a genuine weltanschauung.
The
simple fact is that one cannot be a National Socialist and at the same time
espouse some other doctrine. That is a
contradiction in terms. Either one
embraces National Socialism, or one adheres to some other ideology. Either one recognizes that National Socialism
represents a complete ideological system and that it hold the answers to the
essential questions of life, or one accepts other values and casts one’s gaze
in another direction. Put another way,
either one considers Hitler’s Cause all-important, or one gives priority to
other concerns.
In conclusion, let it be noted that true National Socialists—as distinct from pseudo-National Socialist pretender—are
those who have committed themselves to the Cause of Adolf Hitler
unconditionally and have unreservedly embraced the revolutionary, new Idea
which he has given us and which today is represented by his NEW ORDER.
As the focus for a common
consciousness and a common faith, this Idea—this weltanschauung—now stands as a bright, shining beacon, the sole ray
of hope for embattled Aryankind in an ever-darkening world today.
_________________________
Source:
NATIONAL SOCIALIST BULLETIN, Number 336, Fourth Quarter 1996 / JdF 107